Drew and Scott, 2
co-workers, were both shocked and surprised to see each other at Big Al’s
Factory-Made Home Sales. After chatting in the waiting room a bit, the two men
realized it made sense for both of them to be there. Both men worked for the
same company, under the same job title with job description. Both of them
worked the same shift and hours, and both got paid the same wages. Both of them
put aside a little of each paycheck in a savings account to put towards a house,
and now both of them had saved enough to purchase a house, so they could move
out of their small apartments. It only made sense that they both went to Big
Al’s Factory-Made Home Sales, the most affordable homes in the area.
After a short while,
Big Al invited both men into his office to finish signing and initialing
papers, so they could officially become home owners. As both men signed here
and initialed there, Big Al spoke up in his southern draw, “Now I’m going to
give you boys a tip. I know my houses look so fine that they look like you can
move into them day one, but these houses need a foundation. Heed my advice and
build a foundation for your home before moving into them.” Drew and Scott
paused and looked at each other. They knew they both thought the same thing,
but only Scott bravely spoke. “Are you kidding me?! You know how much money
I’ve poured into this home! Now you want me to spend even more money by
building foundation?! I think not! I suppose I could save some by cutting labor
costs and providing my own labor, but I already burned enough of my free time
working overtime in order to save up for this home, and I’m not about to waste
anymore free time by building a foundation. Please deliver the home to the
address I provided in the paperwork and place it on the cinder blocks. It will
be good enough for me.” With that, Scott signed his last signature, initialed
his last initials, snatched his keys and walked out of the office.
Drew leaned back in
the office chair. He thought about what Scott said, and he could definitely
relate. He too worked a lot of overtime and spent a lot of money on his home.
Big Al, on the other hand, made a good point, too. Al had worked in the business
so long, he must knew what he was talking about. After signing his last
signature and initialing his last initials, Drew asked Big Al if he could
kindly hold on to the home until Drew had a foundation in place on his lot. Big
smiled and agreed. Drew then went back to his apartment and called his landlord
to see if he could extend the lease a bit longer. The landlord understood and
agreed to extend the lease another month. Then Drew began laying his
foundation. It might have taken him a few more weeks to move in his new home
than Scott, but finally, Drew could move into his new house.
Shortly after Drew
moved into his new home, meteorologists buzzed on the news about Hurricane
Damion. “Hurricane Damion is on its way! Just because this hurricane has been
downgraded from a category 5 hurricane to a category 3 hurricane does not mean
it should be taken lightly! Gather up supplies. You may go days without power
or water. Board up your houses. When the hurricane comes, remember to stay in
the center room of your house on downstairs floor.” Everyone listened the
meteorologists. Anyone who attempted to go to a grocery store within a 5-mile
radius of their home found all the bottled water and batteries sold out! Both
Drew and Scott prepared for the storm, buying extra supplies and boarding up
the houses. Both felt confident in their new homes. Drew felt especially
assured with his newly laid foundation. Scott did feel confident, but as the
hurricane got closer, Scott thought about how his father and mother complained
that he never visited enough, so Scott decided now would be a good time to
visit his parents out in the Great Plains.
The day came when the
Hurricane Damion arrived. It only took 1 day to pass through, but it left its
mark, from the uprooted trees to the down power lines. When Drew heard the
hurricane passed over, he walked out the front door, took a few steps out into
the front lawn, and he looked back at his house. The hurricane’s winds had
ripped off a few shingles and a strip of siding, but besides that, the home
stood intact. Drew smiled, glad he took Big Al’s advice. A few days later,
Scott’s flight home touched down in the airport. From there, Scott drove
home…or at least he thought he did. When Drew got there, he found an empty lot.
He went to go look at the house number on the mailbox, but the mailbox had
disappeared, too. He checked the GPS on his phone, and yes, he had the write
address. Where was his house? After driving around a bit, in the nearby trailer
park, Scott found his home…or what he believed to be his home. In reality,
Scott found a pile of wood, drywall and insulation. Scott pulled out his cell
phone, dialed up his mother, and said, “Hey mom, you know how you always
complain that I never visit enough? Well, guess whose coming back to visit?”
What you have just
read is what I call The Parable of the Factory-Made Homes. This is a 21st
century version of a parable Jesus told in the 1st century. Back while in
seminary, my preaching professor taught us that when teaching a parable of
Jesus, a preacher should re-tell the parable in a 21st century context. I agree
with his teaching. All the parable Jesus taught Jesus extremely contextualized,
so his open-minded audience would understand the message, while the
close-minded audience would not understand. Therefore, Jesus used the 1st
century culture as his context, a context which would make no sense to the
modern-day culture in the 21st century. So preacher should study what Jesus
intended the parable to mean, and then teach the parable in a 21st century
cultural context that the audience could comprehend. Still, because I am not an
omniscient rabbi, my parable fails in comparison to the Lord’s parable, so
let’s understand the original parable in light of the 1st century context.
I invite you to turn Matthew 7:24-27. Recall that Matthew is
a Jewish man, writing to a Jewish audience, convincing them that Jesus was the long-awaited
Jewish Messiah. Matthew does so by stocking his Gospel account full of Old
Testament references. Old Testament references does not merely refer to quoting
Old Testament Scripture. Matthew constantly paints Jesus in light of the Old
Testament heroes of faith, like Abraham, Moses and David, to display HIM as
like these men, but better. This parable comes from the Sermon of Mount. Just
as Moses taught the Israelites the Law on Mount Sinai, so Matthew paints Jesus,
on the Mount, teaching the Law, just like Moses. In accordance with covenants,
after listing the laws and stipulations of the covenant, Moses would then
pronounce blessings to those who obey and denounce curses on those who disobey.
In the same way, Jesus ends his teaching with promises to bless the obedient
and curse the disobedient, in the form of a parable. More specifically, this
famous parable concluding the Sermon on the Mount. This context gives a
stronger meaning to the Sermon on the Mount itself. Jesus just finished teaching
believers about kingdom of heaven living. This parable challenges the audience
to follow the teaching Jesus just laid before them. Jesus knows the crowd heard
his teaching, and now he challenges the crowd to listen to his teaching. The
choice does not lie within which teachings to accept and reject, but rather,
the crowd can only choose to either follow the teachings presented before them.
If the people put the teachings of Jesus into practice, the people have
accepted them, but if they don’t put Christ’s words into practice, the people
reject them. As commentator R.T. France states, “The teaching of the Sermon of
the Mount is not an ideal to be admired, but a law to be obeyed.”
“Everyone then who
hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his
house on the rock.” ~Matthew 7:24
Following the pattern of Proverbs (see Proverbs 10:8&14),
Jesus parallels a wise man and foolish man, only with a slight different,
demonstrating that the contrasting decisions result in contrasting
consequences. For the first simile, Jesus compares those who listen to his
words to a wise man who built his house upon the rock. In the Greek, Jesus
emphasizes the word “mine,” demonstrating that his teaching is not another
rabbi’s interpretation but the truth from God himself. Up to this point, the
Jewish people put their hopes in the traditions and interpretations of the
Pharisees, which were like shifting sands. Jesus called the crowd to put their
trust in his truth, which came from God, the same God they knew from the Old
Testament. In the parable, the wise man builds his house on the rock. Jesus
took advantage of his setting, and this statement would have made sense to all
the locals. In Galilee, a man building a house on a rock foundation would not
have to dig far, and sometimes did not have to dig at all. A Jewish audience
would immediately know the rock refers to God. The Old Testament refers to God
as the rock numerous times because the metaphor illustrates the strength,
security and stability of the Lord (see Deuteronomy 32:4, 1 Samuel 2:2, 2
Samuel 22:3, Psalm 18:2 and Isaiah 17:10).
“And the rain fell,
and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not
fall, because it had been founded on the rock.” ~Matthew 7:25
What Jesus describes in Matthew 7:25 is your typical
Galilean autumn storm. Most often, Galilean autumn storms would cause flash
flooding. Galilee can become quite dry in the autumn. The dry ground cannot
speedily absorb the torrential downpour, resulting in flash flooding. Not only
would the heavy rains themselves cause the land to flood, but the rains would
cause nearby rivers to overflow, adding to the floods. Pretty, during these
Galilean autumn storms, it would appears as if the waters came from both down
and up. Jesus uses 2 action verbs to describe the winds, emphasizing that the
winds came from every direction and that suck winds have the power to knock
over buildings. Those listening to the story would expect the house to
collapse, yet it does not. The Galilean homes built on a rock foundation would
survive such storms. In the last independent clause of verse 25, the Greek text
emphasizes “stood firm,” but past perfect indicative passive state. This tense
emphasizes that the house stood firm because of its rock foundation. Likewise,
those who hear the words of Jesus and put them to practice will survive the
storms of life, both literally and metaphorically.
“And everyone who
hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who
built his house on the sand. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the
winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of
it.” ~Matthew 7:26,27
The Jewish audience, familiar with the Proverbs, expect
Jesus to provide a counter example to contrast the fates (see Proverbs 10:25,
12:7 and 14:11). For this counter example, Jesus describes someone who does not
apply his words as a foolish man who builds his house on sand. The Greek word
used here for foolish is μωρός (moros),
from which we get the English word “moron.” Scholars have attempted to locate
where the sandy lands might be, but the consensus seem to be that Jesus means
the land that’s not the rock foundation. Notice the words Jesus used to
describe the storm that hit the house with the sandy foundation matches the
words used to describe the house with the rock foundation. The floods caused by
the Galilean autumn storms would wash away sands and destabilize any house
built on the sand foundation. While a home built on the rock might receive some
wear and tear from the story, a house built on the sand would face utter
destruction. Likewise, anyone who does not pay attention to the words of Jesus
lead themselves down the road of utter destruction.
In both Christ’s parable and my re-telling of Christ’s
parable, the reader will see the main characters had many similarities. Both
men wanted to build a house. Both men got a house which looked ready to move
into and settle. Both men might have even used the same design and the same
materials to build the house. The variance, however, was the foundation. That
variance resulted in impacting the men differently. When the storms came, the
wise man still had a house, but the foolish man had a pile of rubble where the
house one stood. To bring the parable up to its meaning, in the same way, multiple
will hear the words of Jesus numerous times. The only thing separating those
people is whether they apply, or do, those words.
Rabbis during the time of Jesus actually debated if hearing
or doing was more importance. Although the consensus seemed to be both hearing
and doing, a lot of them actually concluded hearing was more important than
doing. They figured that a believer cannot do unless the hear, and thus,
hearing had to be more important. Jesus, however, says contrary. If someone
hears his teaching, he or she now has a duty to follow them. Perhaps Jesus
might have intended to call out the Pharisees nearby, who knew what the Law had
to say, but they did not obey it. If I may roughly paraphrase the words of
commentator A.T. Robinson, “If a Christian wants to live dangerously, the
Christian should listen to sermons with no intention of following them.”
Readers tend to think of the storms representing hardships
in life, and rightfully so, but the storms could also represent God’s justice.
Think about it. In the parable, those who built their home on the rock find
themselves rewarded with a safe and secure home during storms, while those who
build their house on the sand find themselves cursed with a destroyed house. In
the same way, everybody who hears and does the words of Jesus will find
themselves blessed on the day of judgment, while everyone hears the words of
Jesus and does not do them will find themselves cursed. In the end, at the
final judgment, it will all come down to what God thinks, not what other people
think, nor what we think of ourselves. Therefore, the best application of this
parable is to prepare ourselves for the final judgment by doing what Jesus has
taught us.
While the final judgment will be the last and greatest
judgment of all, the Christian should not focus solely the great, final
judgment that will come in the future. Judgment can happen in the present, just
as much as it will in the future. Judgment will sometimes come from God, but
judgment can also come in forms from the world and from life in general. Until
the day of the great, final, judgment, the Christian should interpret the
storms on the trials and tribulations that will lead up the eschaton. The
trials and tribulations, although small in comparison to the great, final
judgment, will prepare and test the Christian for the great, final judgment.
Those who deny their faith when the trials and tribulations on this earth come
will not pass the great, final judgment. Those who will survive the trials and
tribulations of life, as well as the great, final judgement, are those who
heard the words of Jesus and put them into practice. Just like in the parable,
many will hear the words of Jesus, and many will go through trials, tribulation
and judgment. Those who put the words of Jesus into practice will survive all
trials, tribulations and judgments, but those who did not practice Christ’s
words seal their fate. And what’s the number 1 test and trial? Time. False
apostles, prophets and teachers stop speaking of the faith in a matter of time,
but the true children of God live act out the Word of God until their final
breath.
This parable teaches Christians 3 lessons.
First, the parable leaves Christians to ask themselves,
“What do we really believe?” Clearly, this parable teaches that true belief
doesn’t simply profess. Belief does not simply parrot the words of Jesus,
either. True belief leads the believer to act. If believers really believe
something, it will cause the believer to act in a certain way. If Christians
proclaim the Lord has omnipotent, or all-power, Christians should depend on him
when they feel powerless, rather than on their own strength. If Christians
proclaim God as omnibenevolent, or all-good, Christians should blame him for
when evil happens in their life. If Christians act contrary to their doctrine,
or don’t act at all, do they really believe their doctrine?
Second, this parable instructs Christians to work hard on
their faith. I took this parable of out Matthew because most Christians
recognize the parable from Matthew, but Luke also records Jesus teaching this
parable during his Sermon on the Level Plain. While the two variations of the
parable have slight differences (some of which probably account to the
location), one sticks out in particular. Luke records Jesus mentioning that the
wise man dug deep into his foundation on the rock. Foundations take hard work
to build. When the bedrock of Galilee sits on or near the surface, to make it
function as a sturdy foundation, the builder has to dig deep into it. One of my
ancient sources comes from a Greek historian. He records that once he visited an
Arab man in Galilee. The Arab man knew of the earthquakes and floods that hit
the land, so he dig 10 meters (or 30 feet) deep into the bedroom to make sure
the pillars would not move during a natural disaster. The Greek historian
looked on in amazement, not at the elegance of the pillars, but rather, at the
how deep the Arab man dug just to make sure the pillars stood still. I
understand this amazement. I assisted on an archaeological dig when I visited
Israel. For this archaeological dig, I had to wake up at 3:00 a.m. to get ready
for a dig at 4:00 a.m. Just like a typical work shift, I ended at noon. An
archaeological dig need to happen so early in the morning because the sun is
brutally unforgiving. Temperatures could easily rise 100 degrees Fahrenheit by
noon. I carried around a half gallon jug of water every day, and every day, I
finished it by the end of the day. Even with an awning over the dig site, working
outside, even washing pottery, becomes unbearable. This is the 21st
century, with digital alarm clocks and light bulbs. Imagine living in Galilee in
the 1st century A.D. Digging requires the sunlight to see, so the digger
of a foundation has work in the heat of sun. The builder faces temptation to build
in the sand because of ease. The builder has to spend less time in the sun and
doesn’t have work as building his home on a sandy foundation. The rock
foundation requires the builder to spend all day out in the hot sun and
requires extra work. As the parable demonstrates, however, the hard work pays
off in the long run because it creates the house that stands firm in the
storms.
Do Christians work that hard at their faith? Human nature tends
to lean to easy route, but the Bible calls Christians to move than the easy
route. Jesus did not take the easy route, but instead, he took the route to
cross. As Christians, the Bible calls Christians to follow the path of Jesus.
Christians must not succumb to the easy route. As the parable shows, the easy
route leads to shaky foundations in the faith. On the flip side, the Christians
who work hard on their faith will find themselves on the firm foundation of
Jesus. The new nature the Holy Spirit provides all Christians the strength to
endure these hardships. May Christians embrace this gift the Holy Spirit has
given them to build up their faith.
For the 3rd application, if someone asks for a one-word summary this meaning of this parable, the answer is “Choose.” If someone asks for
a two-word summary this meaning of this parable, the answer is, “Actively
choose.” I believe this parable teaches that if you’re not on the foundation of
the rock, that automatically places you on the sand. Unless you actively choose
to listen and follow the words of Jesus, then by default, you face utter
destruction. If you have not actively chosen Jesus, I urge you to do so,
confessing your sins and believing in Jesus. If you have actively chosen, trust
in Jesus to help you stand firm during hardships and judgments.