Right from the bat, in Esther 1:1 , the text introduces the king. Let’s start off
with a question that might seem obvious: What’s the king’s name? It may seem
like an obvious question, but it might change depending how your Bible
translates. Depending on the translation, the king’s name might be “Xerxes” or
“Ahasuers.” It’s not that big of a deal. Xerxes is the king’s Greek name, and
Ahasuers is the king’s Hebrew name. But the king is not Greek or Hebrew; he’s
Persian. So the most “accurate” name would be his Persian name. So what is his
Persian name? His Persian name is “Khshayathiya Khshayathiyanam.” Yeah, good
luck trying to pronounce that. Interesting enough, the name means “king of
kings and lord of lords.” I find that interesting because that’s a title God
gives himself, as seen in Revelation. Maybe Xerxes saw himself as God, or maybe
it’s just a title to show he’s the king of an empire, which is made of many
kingdoms. I don’t want to go too theological into that. But verse 1 does back
up that Xerxes is a king of an empire. Verse 1 says that Xerxes rules over 127
providences from India to Cush , which is the upper Nile
region. In fact, Xerxes extended the Persian to Ethiopia
and Greece
as well. Xerxes’s father was Darius I, which is the one we know from the story
of Daniel. Xerxes reigned from 486-465. There’s the proof that Esther does
belong in the Bible because the story of Esther fits right in that time period.
Esther 1:4-6 records one of the first actions Xerxes does.
The first thing we hear King Xerxes do is throw a banquet, and the Bible
records it happens for 180 days, which is about 6 months. Naturally, some
people question this. Why do some people question this? It’s not feasible to
have a banquet for 180 days. It would six months, taking the princes and
governors away from their jobs to party. At least, that’s what the critics say.
So perhaps a better explanation would be that Xerxes threw a bunch of small
banquets for one prince of governor at a time over a period of 180 days. Also,
may I add this might to rally all his princes and governors to his side. Greece
is threatening to take back their lost land. King Xerxes needs all his
governors on his side to wage war. Well, after this 180 days of banquets, King
Xerxes throws another week long banquet for just the officials in Susa , possibly to thank
them. This banquet is vividly described. So what’s the point of this? What’s
the point of six months and one week of banquets? Why does the Bible want to
describe what the decorations look like? To show us how rich King Xerxes is and
that King Xerxes spares no expense. It shows King Xerxes’s wealth, and in a
way, it shows King Xerxes’s power. He can afford to do this.
Another important part of this banquet was that there was
drinking aplenty. Read Esther 1:7-8. Depending on your nationality, there was
different drinking customs. For example, in the Greek culture, you were
required to drink, and if you did not drink, you were asked to leave. In the
Roman culture, a guest of honor was chosen at random, and he decided when to
drink, where to drink, and how much to drink. According to this passage, Xerxes
did not place rules on this. He let them drink when they wanted, where they
wanted and as much as they wanted. There were no limits. As fun as this might
sound, the danger about alcohol is distorts reality, which leads to rash
judgment. This might have led to the downfall of Queen Vashti.
Now let’s meet Queen Vashti in Esther 1:9. Before we talk
about the queens of Persia
or the wives of Xerxes, I want to mention that this is where archaeology does
not help us. There is no mention of Vashti in the Persian writings at all. In
fact, there is only one mention of a queen, but the name is “Amestris.” Some
have suggested this might be another name of Vashti, but we cannot be sure.
Anyway, this verse tells us that Queen Vashti also threw a banquet, but for the
women. This actually fits with the custom of the day. When banquets were
thrown, men and women were in separate rooms. So that’s probably what is
happening here.
Conflict can sometimes arise in the first chapter of a
novel. While the big conflict does not arise in this chapter, a smaller
conflict will. It happens in Esther 1:10-12. We hear King Xerxes, in front of
nobles, officials and servants, asks for Queen Vashti to appear. What is King
Xerxes trying to do? Show off Queen Vashti. Maybe it’s her beauty he’s trying
to show off, or maybe it is his wealth. When Queen Vashti receives the message,
she refuses to come. Why? Queen Vashti doesn’t want to be used as something to
show off.
So as a problem arises, a solution is sought. It takes
verses 13 to 22 to fully develop the solution. What’s the first thing Xerxes does?
He consults his advisors. Some have suggested King Xerxes is showing weakness
because he can’t make the decision on his own, but needs help to make
decisions. I don’t think this is showing weakness. I actually think he’s being
a good king for seeking guidance and advice. After all, we wouldn’t think the
president is a bad president for seeking the cabinet for help. We wouldn’t
think our president is weak for seeking the cabinet’s advice. King Xerxes is
seeking his cabinet for help. The first “cabinet member” to speak up is
Mermucan. Mermucan suggests that if King Xerxes allows Queen Vashti to
disrespect him, women all over will disrespect their husbands. Maybe it’s true,
maybe it’s false, or maybe it’s just an exaggeration. Either way, it leads
Memucan to give what he thinks is a good solution. Memucan suggests Xerxes
banish Vashti from his presence, which most likely means the whole city of Susa , and a new queen
should replace her. Memucan claims that this will set an example to women to
stay in their place.
I want to spend the rest of the post on focusing on a single
question: “How is this small story important to the big story?” or “How does
Esther 1 contribute to the book of Esther?” First, this story makes a
comparable standard for when Esther becomes queen. We knew the rules set for
the queen, what the appropriate response is suppose to be, and what the result
will be for not following orders. Now I don’t think I’m spoiling the story
because most of you are familiar with the story, but when Esther is queen in
the future, she will also defy the King’s law in a somewhat similar way. The
rule for the queen is that you don’t appear for the king if he does not summon
you, but if he does summon you, you must appear. While Vashti refused to enter
the king’s presence when summoned, Esther enters the king’s presence without
being summoned. Look at how different the results are. Queen Vashti is kicked
out of the capital city. But King Xerxes allows Esther to enter. Why do you
think that is? It could be a difference in laws, Esther has more favor, pure
grace and mercy, or a whole plethora of other options. I’m not going to go any
further into that, as we’ll be able to see it more clearly by the time we reach
that point. Keep that in mind as we get closer to the chapter where Esther
defies the law. It will become clearer then. But for now, I want you to see
that Esther does have an upper hand over Vashti.
But I want you to look at the bigger picture here, which is
the second point that last group hit on. This story opens up a spot for Esther
to be queen. There is no way Esther could have saved her people without being
queen. To be queen, there needs to be an open spot to be made queen. I see God
working here to open up that position. When God calls us to a position, he’s
not going to call us to a position that is already taken. God isn’t going to
always put us in a position that we can get to. God will provide a way to put
us in the place, position, ministry or mission God wants us in. And sometimes
to do that, he’s at work even before we get there, or even before we know it
ourselves. It may even be before we were born. The best example I can think of
is my own life. My parents fell away from the faith after they finished high
school. But when my mother was pregnant with me, my father and mother thought
it would be best to start going back to church to raise me to be a good, moral
American citizen. And I am very sure that if my parents did not make that
decision, I would not stand before you today teaching you the Bible. I had no
control over what parents I would get, and whether they were godly or not. But
God does have control, and he controlled it to be so.
So the lesson about God’s providence in Esther 1 is “setting
the stage.” I’m going to try to put a picture for every lesson, not only to
help you remember the lesson, but also to show God’s providence. In this
picture, a stage crew is setting the stage for a performance. In Broadway
musical and plays, the stage crew sets the stage. The cool thing about the
stage crew is that they are not always seen, but you know they are there and
working because everything is perfectly in place for the actors and actresses
to use. If all the world’s a stage, and the people merely actors, then one of
God’s roles is to be the stage crew, setting the stage for your life. Ever
think hard about that? It might blow your mind. Think about it: God is already
setting the stage and planning out the next stage in your life, even if you
don’t know about it. Now think about where you are in left. Looking back, can
you see how God set you up to be in that position? Every positive blessing that
you have in your life, God set it up for you to have it. Take the time to
praise him for that. If you’re doing the “assignment” I gave you, try to make
your “God Sighting” of the day to be a recent way God has set the stage for
you. Give God the credit due.
Don’t be too worried if you can’t see God setting the stage
right now. This is just the beginning of Esther. As we go through Esther, we’ll
see how God setting the stage leads to God working in other parts of the book
of Esther. And then maybe you can see God working through other parts of your
life, too.
* Picture Credits:
Jacoby, Matt. “Setting the stage at the Princess Theatre, Brisbane .” 29 Oct 2004. Sons of Korah. 3 Sept 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment