Nothing like a controversial title to get your attention. Don’t get me wrong, I do fully believe in the inspiration, infallibility, inerrancy, authority and revelation of the Scriptures. But remember we agreed that John is writing his book to an audience that he assumes has read and understood the synoptic Gospels. Thus, John writes about the new, unique stories of the life of Jesus. Yet John decides to include the Feeding of the 5,000, which all 3 synoptic Gospel writers also include. Yes, this is the only miracle (and possibly the only story period) that all 4 Gospel writers include in their Gospel. Broadly speaking, why would all 4 Gospel writers include the story of this miracle? More specifically speaking, why would John include the miraculous story, and how does it add to his purpose?
Well, let’s do some pre-thinking brainstorming here. Let’s do so by answering this question: How has movies, television (both TV shows and movies made for TV), music, books, magazines and other forms of media depict this story? This was the answer I came up with: “Unless the source of media is sticking to staying true to a certain Gospel account, most of the time, the media will combine all 4 Gospel accounts to get a full picture.” Notice the preamble I used: “Unless the source of media is sticking to staying true to a certain Gospel account…” Well, we are sticking to staying true to a Gospel account, more specifically, John. So we’re going to want to pick out the unique points that John mentions. After all, he wants to give the readers a fresh look at Jesus. The biggest difference I see in the book is the length of the story. While the synoptic Gospel writers take 12-15 verses to tell the story, John takes 70 verses! You might be thinking to yourself, “Well, that’s because you are including every verse of the chapter for John’s account, while for the synoptic accounts, you’re only taking the verses from the actual story.” I do that because I believe while the synoptic Gospel writers simply summarize the events of the pericope (a story from the life of Jesus) and then move onto the next pericope, John connects the rest of the events (mainly the teaching in 6:22-71) back to the Feeding of the 5,000. Like I said in the introduction, if John repeats a story from the synoptic Gospels, he’s going to bring new information with it, like a teaching. So once again, I’m just going to highlight a couple differences in the actual story, but mainly focus on the preaching afterward.
The first difference I want everyone to notice is that Christ’s response to the hunger of the people. John’s Gospel doesn’t mention this, but all 3 synoptic Gospels say that the disciples said to Jesus that the people were probably getting hungry from listening to Jesus in a remote area for so long. Their idea is to send them away to get their own food. In the 3 synoptic Gospels, Jesus says to the disciples, “You give them something to eat,” but John records Jesus saying in John 6:5, “Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?” Does this mean that John got it wrong, and there is an error in the Bible? By no means! All you have to do is look at the next verse, John 6:6. Jesus is saying this to test the disciples. So what Jesus said, according to John, could be summarized, “You give them something to eat” because whatever Jesus said, he meant to bring to light the severity of the need. Actually, I believe that John’s different wording brings to light the disciples’ response. Mark is the only author to record that the disciples objected by claiming they didn’t have enough money. This objection and claim doesn’t make sense how they made the jump from Christ’s suggestion to feed them to the disciples’ claim that they didn’t have enough money. John clarifies that. John records Jesus suggesting they pay for this. Once again, this is Jesus bringing to light the severity of the situation. In order to give each person (the Bible records 5,000 men, but if there was at least 1 woman and 1 child for every man, that’s at least 15,000 people) at least 1 bite, it would take 200 denarii, or 8 months worth of pay, and even that would not fill the people. Things were dire.
The second difference I want to point out is the use of the disciples’ names. In Matthew, Mark and Luke, it simply says, “the disciples.” Jesus tells
the disciples to give the people something to eat.
The disciples tell Jesus there is not enough money.
The disciples find a boy with 2 fish and 5 loaves of bread. John picks out specific disciples. Jesus speaks to
Philip when he asks how to feed the people.
Philip tells Jesus there is not enough money.
Andrew finds a boy with 2 fish and 5 loaves of bread. This is not meant to be seen as John picking on people. Instead, this is to be seen as good character development to make the story telling have more of a real feeling. Instead of giving the generic group “the disciples” John picks out specific people, like Philip and Andrew to show the real-life interaction between Jesus and His disciples. And once again, if John has to re-tell a story, he’s going to do it in a new way, even if it is adding some details.
The third difference I see is the reaction of the crowd. As a matter of fact, neither Matthew, nor Mark, nor Luke records the reaction of the people in the crowd. But John does. John says that the people believed Jesus was The Prophet the Scriptures foretold about. John also tells the reader that they were planning to make Jesus king by force. Why would they do that? Imagine a politician running for president claiming that if he is elected president, he would feed everyone, whether it be handing out government-grown food, reimbursing everyone’s food bills, or simply giving everyone food stamps. I bet he would win the presidential race if he could prove his claim. Well, that’s what the crowd of 5,000 men saw. They saw a man feed them with very little food. It got them thinking, “If this man were our king, we would never go hungry ever again because he could feed the whole nation with whatever little food we had!” They loved this thought so much, they were willing to start a revolution to overthrow the Romans and make Jesus king, even if Jesus didn’t want it! But John also records Jesus knew about their intents, so he high-tailed it out of there!
Now the next story seems to “interrupt” the story of the Feeding of the 5,000, between the miracle and the teaching. It’s a famous story. It’s the story of Jesus walking on the water during a storm on the sea. This one isn’t in all 4 Gospel narratives, but it is in 3 of the 4: Matthew, Mark and John. Yet John seems to talk about the miracle the least. Once again, we ask ourselves, “Why would John include this story?” Well, first of all, it’s just the natural progression of events. After the Feeding of 5,000, the crowd is pressing on Jesus and His disciples. I can almost imagine Jesus shoving the disciples on the boat, yelling, “I’ll fend them off. Go on ahead without me. I’ll catch up!” And I bet the storm came up the minute a disciple said out loud, “How do you think Jesus is going to catch up with us?” Most likely, they thought he would go around the lake or take a different boat later on, but I’m sure the least likely response would be “Walk on water.” I would even more say this story is here for progression of events because Mark tells us that despite Jesus walking on water and calming the storm, they still don’t understand the miracle of the Feeding of the 5,000. This is the perfect segway into John 6:22-71, even if John doesn’t record it. But the second and just as important reason is for the disciples’ reaction because it fulfills John’s purpose. It’s interesting to see that although it answers John’s purpose, John does not record it, but Matthew does. So you don’t have to leave your place in John 6, I’ll put it up right here.
Matthew 14:33-
Then those who were in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.”
Bam! There it is. When the disciples saw Jesus walking on water, they knew Jesus was the Son of God, or God the Son. Although John does not explicitly state it, John believes that through seeing this miracle, the reader will also see Jesus as God. Remember, John only puts 7 miracles in his book, and all of these miracles are to point to Jesus as the Son of God and God the Son. So we understand why the miracle of Jesus walking on water shows Jesus as God, but we still need to see how the Feeding of the 5,000 reveals Jesus to be God. So let’s begin in verse 22.
Meanwhile, while the disciples were sailing across the Sea of Galilee, and Jesus was walking across it (I always wondered if Jesus started walking while the crowd was pressing on him, and if so, I wonder what the crowd’s reaction was…), the crowd has been going to every town on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, looking for Jesus. They still have the intent of forcing him to be king so he can continue making lots of food out of very little food. I love their reaction when they finally find Jesus in the synagogue at Capernaum. It’s like they are saying, “Jesus! It just so happens all 5,000 of us men just so happened to be visiting Capernaum, and lo and behold, you are here! What a coincidence!” Jesus, instead of continuing to try to run away, confronts the people. Jesus basically says in John 6:26, “You’re not here to truly listen to my teaching and follow me. You’re only here to eat more food.” It would be like a youth leader confronting his youth group by saying, “You’re not here for Bible study. You’re just here to eat my snacks and play my games.”
Now the youth accused of such things might try to prove this wrong by playing along in Bible study, even fully participating in answering questions. So the crowd also plays along. They pretty much ask Jesus in John 6:28, “What are teaching, and how do we follow it?” Maybe they are truly playing along, too, hoping that if they do follow Christ’s teaching, He will truly give them more food. Jesus plays along, too, giving a simple answer: Believe in the One Sent. Obviously, the one sent is Jesus. Are you seeing a reoccurring theme of believing in Jesus as the Christ and the Son of God? John in 6 chapters has already driven home his purpose. But he’s not done yet, neither in this book nor in this chapter. He’s got a stronger statement to reveal Jesus is God in John 6. Let’s keep reading.
The crowd is sick of playing games by verse 30, but they don’t want to come out and say it, either. So, being the good Jews they are, they ask Jesus for a sign. You’d think they are completely forgetting the Feeding of the 5,000 that happened just a few verses earlier, but in fact, the opposite is true. They remember the Feeding of the 5,000 quite well, and they are trying to coax Jesus into doing it again. They even use the manna from heaven story in the Old Testament as an example. It’s like the crowd is saying, “Sure, we’ll believe in you, Jesus, but first give us a sign to prove you’re the One. Let’s see, Moses provided manna/bread from heaven as his sign, how about you provide more bread too?” :-D
Jesus isn’t falling for it. First, Jesus corrects the crowd by explaining it was not Moses who gave them bread, but rather God providing bread. Such an attitude reflects the Jews clinging on to the Law and the Lawgiver Moses, instead of God, the true author of the Law. Second, Jesus talks about a bread that gives life. Uh-oh. Another Samaritan Woman at the well incident is about to happen. The people believe that Jesus can provide a literal bread from heaven that can literally give eternal life. Just like the Samaritan Woman, they then demand of this bread. Jesus has the perfect response for that, and I’m going to record it right here.
John 6:35-
Then Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to me will never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty.”
There it is. There is our first occurrence of the 7 “I AM” statements in John, and what a better statement to start it with. This statement is rich with Jewish typology. First and foremost, when Jesus starts off this statement with I AM, the Jews are immediately linking it back to the Great I AM Yahweh. Second, as the Jews earlier in this chapter mention, Jesus is probably linking this back to the manna from heaven. Just as God provided physical bread for the people in the desert, so God provided spiritual bread for the people, who is Jesus Christ. Third, there is a connection to the table of showbread. The table of showbread was inside the tabernacle, on the north side of the Holy Place. On the showbread table was placed twelve loaves of unleavened, fine flour bread. A fresh batch of bread was placed on the table at the beginning of the week, and it would remain there until the end of the week. At the end of the week, the priests would come together to eat the bread together, and a new batch of bread would be put in its place. Jewish tradition says that God kept the bread fresh at all times, as fresh as it was right out of the oven. Another Jewish tradition says that all it takes is a piece of this bread the size of a bean to fill you up completely. The table of showbread had much symbolism to it. There were 12 loaves of bread for the 12 tribes of Israel. The table had a special reason for its location. It was in front of the Holy of Holies, in front of the presence of God. It symbolized that the 12 tribes of Israel were always in the presence of God. God would never forget Israel, and He was keeping a watchful eye over them. This image is further shown with the priests eating the bread together, because it shows God fellowshipping with the people. The bread was a reminder that God was the provider of Israel. All this symbolism transferred to Jesus when Jesus declared Himself “the Bread of Life.” Jesus is always in the presence of God. Jesus is always in the presence of His people, the church. Jesus never forgets His people, the church, and He always keeps a watchful, protective eye over them. Jesus always provides for them, too. Fourth, many times the prophets would mention the Messiah providing for the people food and drink. All these added up together give us strong evidence that Jesus was clearly declaring Himself as God.
Furthermore, in John 6:36-50, Jesus continues to demonstrate that He is God by once again talking about Himself as the Son and talking about God as the Father. Also, Jesus displays He is God because He shows the interlinking between God the Father, Yahweh, and God the Son, Jesus. The Son has everything and everyone the Father gives Him. The Father’s Will and the Son’s Will are one and the same. The Father’s Will is that the Son will raise up everyone who the Father gives the Son. The Father’s Will is that everyone who believes in the Son will have eternal life, which will be given by the Son (and if you remember chapter 5, that power has been given to the Son by the Father). Everyone who listens to the Father and obeys the Father listens to the Son and obeys the Son, and vice versa. No one has seen the Father except the Son, and the only way to see the Father is to see the Son. The interchangeability between the Father and Son makes the reader conclude the Father and the Son are one and the same, so Yahweh and Jesus are one and the same. Once again, the reader sees Jesus is not only the Son of God, but also God the Son!
Now we have a “fun” passage we need to deal with: John 6:51-59. Indeed passages like this are what the Catholics use to support transubstantiation, which is the belief that the bread and wine/grape juice literally becomes Christ’s body and blood respectively. Yet there a lot of holes to expose on using this passage to support transubstantiation. First, the Last Supper has not happened yet, so it can’t be a reference to communion (in fact, the Last Supper will not happen for another year). Second, the Law strictly forbid drinking literal blood, whether it be from man or animal (see Leviticus 3:17, 17:10-14). Third, if Jesus was to talk about the Lord’s Supper, it would only be among the disciples (as he did with the Last Supper) and not unbelievers, like the crowd he is facing now. Fourth, what Jesus is talking about in John 6:51-59 seems to be a requirement. If this were true, then anyone who has not taken communion is not saved and is in hell. Once again, I will bring up that one criminal crucified next to Jesus. He probably never took communion, yet Jesus acknowledged he would be in heaven. So the Last Supper can’t be a requirement. On that same note, this would be hinting that practicing a religious sacrament is what saves you, not believing in Jesus Christ. Last, this passage as a whole makes more sense figuratively than literally. It seems like Jesus rebukes the ones who take what he says literally (see John 6:60-64).
Unfortunately, while we have a strong defense against transubstantiation, we, however, only have a weak stance on any other point of view.
The Bible Knowledge Commentary tries to parallel this passage with John 6:35, claiming “eating Christ’s body” means coming to Jesus, and “drinking Christ’s blood” means believing in Him.
The New Bible Commentary believes “the body of Christ” refers to Christ’s human nature and “the blood of Christ” refers to Christ’s divine nature.
The Bible Exposition Commentary and
The Pulpit Commentary: St. John (Vol. 1) both sum up the metaphor along the lines of, “Just as food and drink gets absorbed into your body for your physical well-being, so you must absorb Jesus in your life for your spiritual well-being” (my paraphrase). There’s a just a few to name. Whatever the right interpretation may be, overall, most schools of thought believe that “eating Christ’s body” and “drinking Christ’s blood” in John 6:51-59 is simply a metaphor for Christ’s atoning death on the cross.
Don’t worry if either the John 6:36-50 or John 6:51-59 got you hung up in confusion. It did the same to the Jewish crowd following Jesus. One minute, the Jewish crowd thinks Jesus is talking about cannibalism. The next minute, the Jews are whining that Jesus is claiming to be all that, while he is simply the son of a carpenter. After both passages, it leaves Christ’s followers to say, “This is a hard teaching. Who can understand it?” (I must note that indeed most Bible translations use the word “disciples” in John 6:60 and 6:66, but in most of our minds, when we think of the disciples of Jesus, we automatically think of the Twelve Disciples Jesus chose. This cannot be the case, for in verse 67, Jesus turns to the Twelve Disciples. Remember that on top of the Twelve, Jesus had a great number of people who followed Jesus wherever Jesus went, even if these people weren’t specifically called by Jesus. To prevent confusion, I will call these people “followers” instead of “disciples.”) What did Christ’s followers mean in verse 60 when they said it was a hard teaching they didn’t understand? Perhaps it could have been they still didn’t comprehend or understand Christ’s teaching. In the parable of the sower, Jesus calls these people “the seed sown along the path” (see Matthew 13, Mark 4 & Luke 8). Maybe the followers meant it was hard to apply to their lives. Either way, they could no longer accept the teachings of Jesus. They were almost unbearable to the Jews to follow. Jesus explains in verse 65 that the reason they do not comprehend or the reason they cannot apply is that the Father has not enabled them. The result? John 6:66. I will put this verse up since this is going to be a climatic event that will totally change the ministry of Jesus, or at least those receiving the ministry.
John 6:66-
From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.
The joke about this verse is that a verse that talks about people falling away from Jesus or people who aren’t Christian is a verse prescribed the verse number 666, the number given to the followers of the Antichrist during the Great Tribulation (who would also be non-Christians). Whether this was intentional or not, this verse does show an epic turning point. Before this verse, or even this chapter, Jesus indeed had a large following. Why did Jesus have to feed 5,000 men, and possibly 15,000-20,000 people? Because that’s how many people were following Jesus up to this point. Jesus had followers in the thousands. After this, Christ’s followers would only be in the hundreds, and maybe not even that (Acts 1:15 tells us that after the ascension, there was only 120). Before this point, it’s very possible people were just following Jesus because it was the popular thing to do. Jesus clearly states that following Him isn’t merely a fad. Jesus called for people to truly follow Him, or don’t follow Him it all. Most public relations experts would tell a public figure this is a bad move to make, for if you want to be popular, you need to appease to your fans. Jesus did not come to this earth to become a popular icon, so in no way was He going to appease to followers just to be liked. Jesus set out His life on earth to glorify the Father, and anyone who wanted to come along was more than welcome, but those who were not on the same path had no part in the ministry of Jesus.
Today celebrities are well aware that a majority of Americans are Christians, so they will appeal to their fans or “followers” by “practicing” Christianity. Politicians will go to church. Rappers will wear crosses around their neck. Athletes will take a knee in prayer after scoring a goal or points, such as a homerun or touchdown. Actors and actresses of both the small television screen and the big silver screen will throw somewhere in their speech accepting an award that they want to thank God or Jesus. Don’t get me wrong, I do believe some politicians, rappers, athletes, actors and actresses legitimately are believers giving God the glory. But at other times I can’t help but wonder if they are just jumping on the popularity bandwagon, knowing that they can earn fans or followers from the Christian faith by doing such things. Sure they might believe in the Jesus who fed 5,000 men, but do they believe in the Jesus that preached hard teachings, not just eating his body and drinking his blood, but also giving up your life, giving up riches of the world, and giving up a sinful lifestyle? Just like the people in John 6:66, when they faced with these teachings, they too might turn their backs and no longer follow Jesus. But the ones who stayed are the true believers.
That’s what we see in John 6:67-71. Jesus turns to the Twelve Disciples, and He pretty much asks them, “Are you going to leave me too?” It’s almost as if Jesus is saying, “Now’s your chance to leave if you want to.” I really love Simon Peter’s answer. Even though Simon Peter says it, you can tell all Twelve are behind him on this. To sum it all up, Peter says, “Yeah, your teaching is hard, but it’s still the truth, and we know it’s the truth because You are the Holy God. So we’re committed to being your disciples.” I will say it again, I really love Peter’s answer. It’s a great application for Christians today in the 21st century. Indeed, the teachings of Jesus are hard. They call us to be holy not in our actions alone, and not just words and actions, but in actions, words and thought. They call us to constantly confess and repent of sins in our life. They call us not to lift up ourselves, but to lift up God in glory. They teach us to love God and others before ourselves. They call us to reject riches if it puts someone in poverty. None of this is easy, and they are especially hard with a sinful nature which wants all of them. Our world tries to live by this philosophy: “If it’s too hard to do, all we have to simply do is stop believing, and then we can stop following them and take the easy path.” But as Simon Peter revealed, when we entertain such thinking, we are really fooling ourselves. Simply choosing not to believe in something does not mean it ceases to exist. I can stop believing gravity exists, but that doesn’t mean I’ll start floating away because I stopped believing gravity. Gravity is still there, whether I believe it or not. The same is true for God. God still exists, whether people choose to believe it or not, and choosing not to believe in God does not lead to escape of God’s Law. But many people, as the people in John 6:66, believe that when God’s teaching gets too tough, we can walk away so we can take the easy path. On the contrary, it makes us guiltier because we are consciously aware of the Law, yet refuse to follow it.
I must also point out that Simon Peter calls Jesus “The Holy One of God.” Once again, Peter’s testimony is the proof that Jesus is God because you can’t get any more straight forward than the Holy One of God. To be the Holy One of God, you must be God. It fits John’s purpose perfectly. Speaking of John’s purpose, let’s conclude John 6 by going back to my introduction to the chapter and answering the broad and specifics of why John, as well as the other Gospel writers, decided it was necessary to mention the Feeding of the 5,000.
Broadly speaking, why did all 4 Gospel writers decide their accounts of the life of Jesus needed the Feeding of the 5,000? Think about the other miracles Jesus performed. Jesus healed the blind. The only people who can really relate to this are blind or visually impaired people who desire to see with 20/20 vision. Jesus healed the deaf, but the only people who could relate to this or the blind or those who need a hearing aid, both who wish to hear on their own. Jesus healed the mute, but the only ones who could relate are the mute, or possibly those who stutter, has a lisp or some other speech impediment. Jesus healed the paralyzed, but the only people who can relate are those who need the help of a wheelchair, crutches or a walk to move around. Well what about those who see, hear, talk and move perfectly? How can they relate? All people need food. Most people can’t go more than a month without food. There are roughly 800 million people around the world who are starving, but even if you’re not one of those 800 million, you’ve probably felt hunger before, when you’ve gone a long time without food and your stomach starts growling. Everybody can relate to needing food, so everyone can relate to needing to be fed. Thus, everyone can relate to the Feeding of the 5,000. Therefore, all the Gospel writers including the Feeding the 5,000 narrative because it doesn’t matter if you are Jew, Roman, Greek or Christian, everyone needs food and everyone Jesus to be that ultimate provider.
Specifically speaking, why did John decide to include the Feeding of the 5,000, especially after Matthew, Mark and Luke did it before him? We’ve already discussed the broad reasons, but to get to specific reasons, we got to look at John’s purpose and portrayal of Jesus. What’s John’s purpose? John wrote the book of John to persuade Christians [to continue] to believe Jesus is the Son of God and Christ. How is John portraying Jesus? Jesus is the Son of God, or God the Son. So how does the Feeding of 5,000 demonstrate to the reader Jesus is the Son of God, or God Himself. We can go with the obvious answer of “Only God could manipulate nature to fully feed all those people with such little food,” but let’s look deeper than that. How does John add to the story what the synoptic Gospel writers did not? Giving names and revealing Christ’s intent as well as the crowd’s intent seems kind of petty. The best answer is that John demonstrates that the Feeding of the 5,000 was a small part of a bigger picture. Since the pericope of the miracle is only about 1/5 of the chapter, it almost seems as if the miracle is only the introduction, or the attention-getter, of the bigger message Jesus wants to preach. It is like the miracle is only the visual aid to His teaching. So to look into how it reveals Jesus as Christ and God the Son, we have to look into the message. What does it say? It makes Jesus and God one and the same. It makes salvation and eternal life only possible through Jesus. All these add to up to Jesus being portrayed as the Son of God. But suppose we wanted to narrow it down to one verse. If the miraculous Feeding of the 5,000 was the introduction, then the thesis of the chapter would be John 6:35, where Jesus declares “I AM the Bread of Life.” Everything before the verse points forward to this verse, and everything after points back to the verse.
After 6 chapters of John, we’ve already gone through 5 miracles, and only have 2 remaining. But in John 6, we reached our first “I AM” statement and have 6 more to go. So as we continue through John, let’s focus less on miracles and more around the teachings that surround the “I AM” statements about Jesus.
